Core-back tooling can keep a part in place between two injection shots. Review the mold sequence, material interface and cycle evidence before choosing the process.
Two-shot injection molding does not automatically require a rotating mold. In a core-back arrangement, movable tool elements reserve space for the second shot, then retract after the first shot has been molded. The part stays in place while the cavity changes around it. Whether that arrangement suits a product depends on geometry, material behavior and the complete cycle.
A two-color ABS example from ARBURG
ARBURG's September 22, 2025 K 2025 preview describes an ALLROUNDER MORE 2000 with 2,000 kN clamping force and a 32-cavity domino mold. A vertical injection unit forms the gray ABS front. Hydraulic cylinders then retract cores and pins, creating room for green ABS injected from the horizontal unit. The second shot forms the back and fills the front indentations. The mold stays closed between shots, with no rotation. ARBURG gives a cycle time of approximately 60 seconds for the 32 parts.
This is a historical technical example, not a new machine launch. This article uses core-back descriptively for the retracting-tool sequence; ARBURG does not name it that way in its announcement. Sumitomo (SHI) Demag's process overview describes core-back as sequential injection into one cavity, with moving tooling releasing space for the second component.
Match the mold concept to the second-shot geometry
The first design question is where the second material must go. A local color feature, a back layer and an overmold covering several surfaces may demand different access to the first shot.
Core-back is worth evaluating when moving a defined set of tool elements can expose the required volume while the first shot remains adequately supported. The toolmaker must show how those elements move, where the second melt enters and how the material boundary is sealed.








